Babi Yar Massacre

Starting from September 29 of 1941, the Nazi army began the mass murder of 100,000 people at a death pit known as Babi Yar in the city of Kiev, Ukraine. The story traces the sequence of events that led to the murder of thousands of these victims: the Pavlovskaya patients. It started with Joseph Stalin’s collective farm program which resulted in the famine that killed over 20 million people. That resulted in thousands of heartbroken communists to betray this system by passing out leaflets about the failure of communism. That resulted in the arrests and commitment into the Pavlovskaya mental hospital. But how did these people end up getting murdered by the Nazis at Babi Yar? Mr. Sanchez uses film evidence to prove that U.S. mental hospitals are being used in the same way as the Pavlovskaya. Could a similar massacre happen in the U.S.?

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

When I was accused of distributing political literature on federal property, both judges: Margaret Nagle and Stephen Hillman ruled that all my eyewitnesses were irrelevant. Okay, eyewitnesses who saw everything are “irrelevant” in U.S. courts. Okay, so what kind of witness is considered “relevant” in the U.S.A.?

I moved out of the U.S. in 2002. Prior to this time, I had studied many cases and attended many trials such as the Anthony Gutierrez case and Rony Vasquez case. I now wish I could attend the Bradley Manning case, but now I live here in Kiev. It now costs over $1,200 to go to the U.S. After many years of attending trials in the U.S. prior to 2002, I have learned that which witness is relevant or irrelevant depends on the accusation. If you are accused of distributing political literature that the judge doesn’t want you to distribute to the public, then, of course, all your eyewitnesses will be ruled irrelevant. In freedom of speech cases, only those false witnesses that will say that you are dangerous and that you need to be “deterred from further criminal activities” are the only witnesses who will be ruled relevant even if these liars were not there when you were arrested nor at your trial.

U.S. judges also use prisons as a false witness agency. If a U.S. judge wants to frame somebody they don’t like, they offer a deal to a convicted drug dealer or murderer to falsely testify against somebody. Convicted drug dealers gladly lie in court in exchange for their freedom. It’s the easier way for criminals to get out of prison. In the U.S., judges use prison time as currency to pay liars to lie in U.S. courts.

Letter to Rashid Jibri

Dear Mr. Rashied Jibri

Thank you for contacting the PAUL REVEERE BLOG. For the last 5 years, we have been trying to solicit opinions about the mental hispitals by sending letters to all the doctors involved in our case, but all of them have stonewalled our letters. You are the first to bravely offer an opposing point of view against our usual anti-mental hospital diatribes. We are trying to offer the most controversial blog on the internet. But how can we be controversial, if nobody offers any controversy?

Your letters shows us that you didn’t understand my question. I didn’t ask you if it is legal in the U.S. to drug political critics in mental hospitals for upto 72 hours. All of our readers and viewers already know that U.S. law requires that all political critics must be drugged in a mental health care facility for upto 72 hours to deter them from making any more comments against the police and U.S. government. That’s a no-brainer. Everybody all over the world knows how the U.S. government deals with insolent comments against the police or U.S. government. That was not my question.

My question is:

Is it legal in the U.S. for anybody to be held in custody at a mental hospital for LONGER THAN 72 HOURS even if such a person keeps repeating over and over “I DO NOT WANT TO HURT ANYBODY NOR MYSELF?”

I was strapped to a bed with a T.V. camera over my face at night. During the day, I was stapped to a chair. This went on for more than 144 hours. Seven days. During these 7 days, I kept repeating, “I DO NOT WANT TO HURT ANYBODY NOR MYSELF.” Was that legal? I have read §5150 many times. Read my blog. I have drawn many cartoons about §5150. I have written many jokes about §5150. Read the cartoon about a law book being tortured by a pig, and forced to confess that “Mr. Sanchez said that he wants to ‘hurt somebody or himself’. ” You can torture the law all you want. You can make the law say anything you want it to say. You can interpret it in any way you want, but I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT I WANT TO HURT SOMEBODY NOR MYSELF.

You letter mentions only one mental hospital, i.e., LAC/USC MEDICAL CENTER. My grievance was not written about ONE mental hospital. It was about 7 mental hospitals. What about

Augustus Hawkins Behavioral Health Care?

Del Amo Behavioral Health Care?

Mission Community Hospital?

Gateways Behavioral Health Care?

Harbor UCLA Medical Center?

Bridges at Little Company of Mary?

Augustus Hawkins: 15 arrests. All much longer than 72 hours.

Del Amo: 21 days. Longer than 72 hours.

Mission Community: 10 days. More than 72 hours.

Gateways: 11 months. More than 72 hours.

Harbor UCLA: 4 arrests = 10 days. More than 72 hours.

Bridges at L.C. of M: 3 days added to a 21 day hold. More than 72 hours.

During all these arrests I kept repeating the same statement: “I DO NOT WANT TO HURT ANYBODY NOR MYSELF” Was any of all this legal in any way? Name one thing that they did that was legal.

Thank you for commenting on the Paul REVEERE BLOG. We all want to learn more about U.S. mental hospitals.

Sincerely,

Carl Sanchez

The Mother of All Evidence

Contract with the Devil

Theoretically, I have some sort of marginal limited facsimile of something that could pass for “freedom of speech.” Yes, I’ve been allowed to upload my cartoons and articles on social media without having the C.I.A. or F.B.I. coming here to arrest me in Kiev, YET. Yes, I’ve been allowed to upload my films on YouTube without getting arrested. But let’s face it, YouTube is not exactly CNN, BBC, ABC, NBC, or CBS. Whatever little scraps of freedom they grudgingly throw at me, comes at a very VERY HIGH COST.

As long as I stay here in Kiev, I can get away with this limited “freedom of speech.” The C.I.A. is not sailing a submarine under the Dnipro River watching me cross the bridges or making my films at Hidro Park Island. (Although my mother thinks they are.) The C.I.A. is not watching me from a spy satellite out in space as I walk on Khreshchatyk Street. (Although my mother says “Well, they could be. You never know.”) So that’s why “freedom of speech” is something I have here; not in the U.S.A.” Freedom of speech” is limited to crossing the Atlantic. As soon as I set the first step at a U.S. airport, all hell breaks loose. It’s like opening Pandora’s box. All kinds of devils pop out of hell like bees swarming out of beehive. Either they arrest me right there at the airport or they arrest me later when I get too close to a mental hospital or just because I’m walking down the street with my 6-year-old niece. Travon Martin was killed for being black or for walking in a white neighborhood without a car. There are many towns in the U.S. that have no bus or rail system. People there never walk to the corner store. Even if the corner store is 20 yards away, people prefer to drive their cars 60’ to the corner store. The police have never seen anybody walking down the street without a car. The police can only see Osama Bin Laden walking down the street with an atom bomb in his backpack. You will be arrested or killed like Travon Martin.

Yes, the U.S. has something that sort of looks like “LIBERTY.” But is it worth it? Is “liberty” or “freedom of speech” worth the hell of being arrested just for walking down the street with a little child? Yes, as long as I stay in Kiev I have the freedom to publish my political articles and broadcast my films through the internet. But what happens when I visit the U.S., I pay for this freedom of speech” by sitting at a mental hospital. Is it worth it? It’s like signing a contract with the devil. Yes, I enjoy having thousands of readers and viewers who listen to me. But at what price? The top line is that I become charismatic with thousands of followers. But what’s the bottom line? What price do I have to pay the devil for this pathetic ration of freedom? Yes, I have some sort of nominal freedom through the internet. But then it’s time to pay the devil when I visit the U.S. The bottom line in the devil’s contract is that the cops hate my guts. The cops slice up my backpack with a knife and scatter my kidney medication all over the bottom of my suitcase or they just “liberate” my medication without paying for it. Then they commit me to a mental hospital. The psychiatrists hate my guts. They torture me with such horrible medication. The judges hate my guts. They refuse to listen to my eyewitnesses. Is it worth it? Freedom of speech in the U.S. is never “free.”