Judge Stephen J. Hillman

If you are a murderer who has murdered an enemy of Judge Stephen Hillman (e.g. murdering a drug dealer,) the judge will dig down the barrel to find any petty loophole to get you out of prison. If, however, you are a political critic wrongly and illegally accused of distributing political literature on “federal property,” the judge will dig deep down the barrel to find any loophole to keep you in prison as long as possible without any constitutional rights. His favorite scam to bypass the Constitution is to rule that you are “insane.” He type casts you as a “nut case” so that he can rule all your eyewitnesses as “irrelevant” by saying that you are unaware that all those witnesses watching you get arrested where not really there. They were just “fantasy witnesses who never existed.” Then he will refuse to allow you to have a jury trial by keeping you at GATEWAYS Community Correction Center. Judge Hillman claims that GATEWAYS is not a real prison so that GATEWAYS is a loophole to the 6th Amendment right to a jury trial. This is how Judge Hillman gets away with keeping you in prison for a year without listening to any of your eyewitnesses.

Oh, yes, Judge Stephen Hillman; “The Hussein of da Railroading Train,” “The Fidel of the Steel Bar Hotel,” “The Ho Chi Min of the Suicide Machine,” “Da Osama of Sending Ya to Da Slamma,” “der Führer of die Frameup Terror,” “the Stalin of the Patty Wagon haullin.”

Prince of Meshech and Tubal

NOW PLAYING ON YOUTUBE!!!

The Mother of All Evidence

6-year Girl Arrested

6-YEAR OLD GIRL ARRESTED

BY SAN JACINTO P.D. FOR

SITTING UNDER SHADE

OF TREE IN 120° F DAY

San Jacinto, California June 30,2013. My niece Irina was arrested for loitering under a willow tree in front of a high wall surrounding a "high class" community. 

My niece wanted to eat a burger at the jack-in-the-box. I live in the Ukraine and you can’t drive a car from eastern Europe to California. When I try to visit my family in California, I arrive without a car. There are no buses in San Jacinto. I have walked for hours looking for a bus stop and I’ve asked many people. THERE ARE NO BUSES!!! Everybody drives expensive new cars or fancy R.V. trucks. They have never seen a man walking on a sidewalk (pavement) with a little girl. Such a sight in some parts of California, is as unusual as an alien “star ship” from “Klingon” landing in the middle of a hill-billy village.

It was 120°F. Irina wanted to rest under the shade of a tree. I was thinking about the infamous “loitering” laws that have infected the U.S. “NO” I firmly insisted, “the Jack-in-the-Box is not far away. They have air conditioning. You can rest there.”

Then she looked at me with those sad glossy lost-puppy-dog eyes and pleaded, "Pleeease, uncle, I’m getting dizzy"

Oh-oh, I was thinking about all those French people who died in the heat wave of 2007. "Okay! Okay! okay! sit down under this tree,” I said as I took a bottle of water from my backpack .

The U.S is the only country in the world that has loitering laws. The U.S. loitering laws were made by white people who were terrified of black people. Whenever a black man would stand in front of the home of a white family to wait for a bus, meet a friend, a date, or a taxi, the white family would tremble, pee in their pants in uncontrollable panic. The enforcement of U.S loitering laws are 100% contingent to the whims or caprices of the police.  In all my life, I have never seen nor heard of a white main getting arrested for loitering, PERIOD.

A black man getting arrested for loitering is as normal as a sunny day in California.

After the short shade break, Irina said she was feeling better. So we got up and continued to walk towards the Jack-in-the-Box. Ten minutes later, a police car stopped suddenly beside us and the cops ran out. They told me to stop. Then a police-woman ran towards Irina; grabbed her; and took her into a police car. Then the male cop grabbed me by my arms and handcuffed me. Much later, Irina told me that the policewoman had handcuffed her in the police car and the cuffs were very tight and painful. The male cop made me sit on the sidewalk and began to ask me questions.  I knew that they wanted me to make another false confession but I didn’t know what lie they wanted me to tell.  I suspected that they wanted me to confess to kidnapping Irina. But that was not the true reason why they arrested me.

Much later, Irina’s mom told me what happened. There was a neighbor who saw us sitting under the willow tree during the shade break. He (or she) had called the police and asked them to arrest us for loitering under the tree. But I didn’t know the true reason for the arrest. I didn’t know that they wanted me to testify against her by saying that I saw her loitering in front of walled community. I didn’t know that they wanted me to confess to conspiracy to loitering under a willow tree. Two more police cars arrived and so there were a total of 4 police officers. Two cops held me in one police car and the other 2 cops held Irina hand-cuffed in the other police car. They held us in custody for at least an hour. The law gives me the right to refuse to testify against Irina or against myself. This is why I refused to answer their questions. Irina is just 6 years old. Why should they force me to testify against her? An hour later Irena’s mom arrived by car. Perhaps it’s because Astrid is blond with blue eyes. Either way she convinced them (or threatened them) to drop the charges against us. As Irina walked to Astrid’s car, Irina was crying loudly. Her face was wet with tears. Her eyes were red from crying for an hour in a police car without airconditioning. Her eyes were bulging out so much that it looked as if they would explode. As she cried, the 4 cops were laughing so loudly that it was more of a loud roar than a laugh.

Okay, okay, I know that it’s normal in the U.S to get arrested just for walking on a public sidewalk. I have been arrested for standing in front of the Temecula Court house waiting for it to open early in the morning. That’s normal, of course. I’ve been arrested for distributing political literature on Los Angeles Street. Okay, okay that’s normal in the U.S.. Nobody cares about that. But now they’re arresting 6-years-old kids. IS THAT NORMAL? Now that they’ve started to arrest little kids for loitering under a tree, what will they do next? Who will get arrested next? I have tried to explain to Irina what “loitering” means. But she still doesn’t understand. She doesn’t understand why people don’t want her to sit under the shade of a willow tree. She said “But, uncle, Pokahantas didn’t get in trouble for sitting under Grandmother Willow. Didn’t Pokahantas live in the U.S? Wasn’t she American? Uncle, in the Ukraine where you live, do they arrest kids for sitting under a tree?”

When she sat under the tree, she was not in front of somebody’s home. She was sitting in front of the Parkside Village which has a 6’ high wall all around it. So no one from this walled community could have seen her under the willow tree with such low hanging branches. So who called the cops? It must have been somebody across Sanderson Street who lives in that weed infested hillbilly cabin. “Fear” is the greatest danger to national security. “Fear” is the illness that killed Travon Martin. It was F.D.R who said, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.”

Will the U.S be “the home of the cowards? “or” “the home of the brave?”

PRPDDD

3 wise-guys monkeys

Dr. Chaska has a dream

Da Wong Dakta Wong

Dr. Wong is one of the psychiatrists who held me in custody against my will at Del Amo Mental Hospital. He always wore a stethoscope around his neck and always tried very hard to con me into believing that he is a normal doctor. Every time that he talked to me, he would put the stethoscope on my chest, ask me to breathe in deeply, hold it, breathe out, check my pulse, and would stick a tongue depressor in my mouth to look deep into my throat. I wasn’t sick. I didn’t want a check up. But he wanted very hard to prove to me that he was not the most stupid quack in the whole world. (It doesn’t take the most stupid quack to kill a healthy person.) (Any average quack can do that.) I didn’t want a check up. I just wanted to visit my friends and family. I hadn’t seen my family for the last 2 years. I had come to the U.S. to visit my family, not for a check up from Dr. Quack.

After the fake check up, Dr. Wong said that I would be getting out of Del Amo “today,” “You’re either going home or a partial. Either way, you’re getting out today,” he said.

I thanked him out of courtesy, but I never trust a U.S. psychiatrist farther than I can throw a pregnant elephant. I knew he was just another freaken liar like all the others. Two hours later, a woman said that she is my “public defender,” and that she would be representing me at my “trial” to decide whether I would be held in custody for 14 more days or released today.

The courtroom was a small office like in this cartoon. A WASP woman was sitting behind the desk, and Dr. Wong was sitting on the right of the desk. The so-called “public defender” was on the left of the desk. Then Dr. Wong began to tell the so-called “judge,” “I would like to keep Mr. Sanchez here at Del Amo for a 14 day hold. Mr. Sanchez is totally unaware of the seriousness of his illness. He thinks that his $8.⁰⁰ is enough money to find a place to live in and pay for all living expenses for several months. If we were to release him into the community, he would not have the mental skills to find a place to live. He would end up sleeping on the streets and would not be able to get the medication and treatment that he need to recover from his illness.

I had already served 7 days by then. I served a total of 18 days at Del Amo plus 3 more days at Little Company of Mary Bridges in San Pedro. It was then a total of 21 days. I tried to present a lot of evidence to prove to that “judge” woman that I had thousands of dollars in the bank. But she just looked at me with a big smile as if I was just a cute little Mexican with a big “ranchero” hat over my face taking a “siesta” propped up against a seguaro cactus.

I spent a few days with my family and then I had to come back here to Kiev to go back to work. And that’s what I did for my summer vacation of 2010.

The Big Spender

 

Asymmetrical Warfare. Temper Tantrum

Asymmetrical Warfare

Wikileaks Plumber

The Jury Trial

Lawful process

Pedro Castillo, public defender

Streeeeeeeeeeetching the truth

Cutting-edge L.A.P.D.

Science Method

Ronald Coose said: “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
You could be a scientific as you want, you can use a hundred expert scientists to “prove something” but it doesn’t mean it’s true.

Anger Management

It is not a crime to distribute political literature on a public sidewalk. It is not a crime to refuse to answer questions from the police or U.S. Customs. It is not a crime to refuse to fill out a U.S. customs form. It is not a crime to criticize the U.S. government. However, I’ve been arrested 23 or 24 times for doing such things. Since Uncle Sam can’t keep me in a normal prison for doing such things, he keeps me in mental hospitals. Using a mental hospital to punish such political prisoners is not a new idea. Josef Stalin used to do the same thing. The Pavlovskaya Mental Hospital here in Kiev is such a hospital. Such hospitals had “re-indoctrination” programs to brainwash these so-called “patients” into “getting with the program” of communism. Today, mental hospitals such as Del Amo, have the so-called “ANGER MANAGEMENT THERAPY,” which serves as an American counterpart to the Soviet re-indoctrination program. At this “ANGER MANAGEMENT THERAPY,” the doctors don’t try to turn me into a communist. However, they do try to convince me that the L.A.P.D. are very sweet and lovable angels form heaven who dedicate all their lives to help me in any way they can. However, since I have received a few beatings and torture from the L.A.P.D., the doctors are wasting their time on me. They will have better success in convincing George W. Bush to become a hardcore communist.

I have learned my lessons from Jesus, Gandhi, Dr. M.L.K., John Lennon, and Gorbachov. Uncle Sam has learned his lessons from Josef Stalin.

Lawful means to express concerns

In a secret letter written to Judge Margaret Nagle, Probation Officer Karenina Legg wrote:

It is hoped a brief period of confinement will cause the defendant to reconsider his plan to disregard federal regulations and to choose lawful means by which to express his political concerns.

Karenina Legg was not there when I was arrested for distributing political literature on a public sidewalk. She was not even present at my trial. She says that I had a “plan to disregard federal regulations” because she heard this from Pedro Castillo who says that the officers said that I had said. I did not know that Officer Legg had written this letter until 6 years after my release from prison. Pedro Castillo was paid to prove to the judges that I had no such plans to disregard any federal regulations. In court, Mr. Castillo put on a big Hollywood show about how I had no intentions to disregard any laws, or regulations. But secretly, he took a document (see pages E12 and E13 of The Mother of All Evidence) that I had given to him to prove that I had no intentions to disregard any regulations and secretly gave it to Karenina Legg. He told her to use it to prove to the judges that I was going to do a serious crime unless the judges put me in prison for as long as possible. If you read this document, you will see that on the first page on the very first line it reads: GOAL: to get Carl Sanchez arrested WITHOUT DOING ANY CRIME. The 6^th Amendment guarantees that I have a right to confront all witnesses against me. But how could I confront Karenina Legg when she was not there at my trial and I didn’t know that she had written such a letter against me until 6 years after I got out of prison? And how can I confront all witnesses against me if nobody told me that Pedro Castillo, my “lawyer,” was one of these secret witnesses against me? When I asked Mr. Castillo to write a letter about why my eyewitnesses were forbidden to testify about the truth, Mr. Castillo said, “I’m not going to write such a letter because I didn’t want your eyewitnesses to tell the truth. I didn’t want you to distribute any literature and I wanted you to go to prison.”

Karenina Legg says that if I spend a “period of confinement” (i.e., prison) I will “choose lawful means by which to express my political concerns.” Okay, what “lawful means” is she talking about? Does she mean suing Pedro Castillo or suing the judges? Supposing that I had a ton of money to sue Judge Hillman and pay my witnesses for all those days of missing work to show up to all the hearings, motions, depositions, stipulations, demurrers, status hearings, etc., etc., that it takes in any normal civil case, what guarantee do I have that the next judge won’t rule again that all my eyewitnesses are all irrelevant? So if Judge Verdugo or Hugo or Dego rules that all my eyewitnesses are all irrelevant, then what? Do I sue Judge Verdugo? Then what do I do if Judge Tanner rules that my eyewitnesses are irrelevant? Do I sue Judge Tanner? How many judges do I have to sue until I find a judge who wants to hear the truth? What does Karenina Legg mean by “lawful means?” Two judges refused to listen to my eyewitnesses: Hillman and Nagle. At Del Amo Behavioral Health Canter, the judge refused to look at the evidence that would prove that I had more than $8 to my name. At El Centro, Judge Jack Staton refused to let me subpoena my passport from the State Department to prove that I am a U.S. citizen. What does Karenina Legg mean by “lawful means?”